Legal Opinion

Montgomery County Park District v. Kinney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1980No. 79-793PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.

The issue presented in this cause is whether park district property must be used exclusively for public purposes for it to be extended a property tax exemption under R. C. 5709.10.

In relevant part, R. C. 5709.10 provides:

“***[P]roperty belonging to park districts, created pursuant to section 1545.01 of the Revised Code, shall be exempt from taxation.”

The commissioner bases his appeal solely on the contention that R. C. 5709.10 implicitly includes an exclusive public use requirement. He does not dispute that the literal terms of R. C. 5709.10 merely require that a park district own the subject…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Denison University v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Atwell v. Board of Park Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District v. WaltonOhio Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Talawanda City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API