Legal Opinion

Cabla v. Shockley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 4, 1966No. 7602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENTON, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Albert Cabla, sought a mandatory injunction which would require W. J. Shockley, appellee, to completely remove an earthen dike or dam built and maintained by appellee along the common boundary line of the parties’ property. Appellant alleged the dike interfered with the natural flow of surface water from Cabla’s land and that as a result of such interference his land suffered continuing damage. Two special issues were submitted to the jury and the jury found the dike did not obstruct the natural flow of the surface water from appellant’s land so as to impound…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dallas Independent School District v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Nolte Irr. Co. v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Rio Grande City v. Starr CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Piwonka v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Langford v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. City of Dallas v. GaechterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Joyce DeAnda v. Abbey Moor of Trophy Club Homeowners' Association, Inc., and Darrel Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2026
  4. Zelios v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Zelios v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API