Legal Opinion

Nolte Irr. Co. v. Willis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1944No. 5607PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARE, Justice.

The appellant, Nolte Irrigation Company, sought judgment against the appellee, B. H. Willis, for permanent mandatory injunction which would require the appellee to remove certain dams and embankments theretofore built and being maintained by the appellee, or to make and maintain adequate openings and spillways in each of them, so that the water impounded and retained by the dams and embankments would not interfere with the operation of the appellant’s irrigation canal system. The appellant alleged that these dams and embankments were obstructing the natural drainage of surface…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hill v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Miller v. LetzerichTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Powers v. Temple Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Simon v. NanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Johnson v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Langford v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Tucker v. Graham, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1994
  3. Peck v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. City of Dallas v. GaechterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Rio Grande City v. Starr CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API