Zelios v. City of Dallas
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentAkin, Justice
I cannot agree with the majority opinion that the trial court’s finding that appellant knowingly violated the zoning ordinance obviates the necessity of the city to show that serious injury may occur if the structure is not removed by mandatory injunction. Instead, I would adhere to our original opinion. I can see no logical reason to draw a distinction between a case where the property owner unknowingly violates an ordinance and a situation where the owner knows prior to construction that the structure violates the zoning ordinance. Neither can I accept the rationale of the majority, as well…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Fort Worth v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Nolte Irr. Co. v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- City of Dallas v. GaechterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Cabla v. ShockleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- City of Amarillo v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955