Legal Opinion · Dissent

Zelios v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1978No. 19541Published

1DissentAkin, Justice

I cannot agree with the majority opinion that the trial court’s finding that appellant knowingly violated the zoning ordinance obviates the necessity of the city to show that serious injury may occur if the structure is not removed by mandatory injunction. Instead, I would adhere to our original opinion. I can see no logical reason to draw a distinction between a case where the property owner unknowingly violates an ordinance and a situation where the owner knows prior to construction that the structure violates the zoning ordinance. Neither can I accept the rationale of the majority, as well…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Fort Worth v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Nolte Irr. Co. v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. City of Dallas v. GaechterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Cabla v. ShockleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. City of Amarillo v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API