Legal Opinion
Banks v. Ferrell
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 4, 1979No. 14170PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
Appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his “motion for injunctive relief.” Finding this action barred by the limitations of the case or controversy doctrine, we affirm.
I
Appellant Carlton N. Banks began serving a two-to-six year sentence at Lorton Reformatory for forgery in mid-1976, with a parole eligibility date of November 8, 1977. • On or about November 3, 1977, Banks appeared before the D.C. Parole Board (Board) to be considered for parole. 1 See D.C.Code 1973, § 24-204; 9 DCRR §§ 101, 102. On that same date, the Board denied Banks’ application for parole…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Palmore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- District of Columbia v. WaltersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Atchison v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- District of Columbia v. Group Insurance AdministrationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Alden v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bennett v. RidleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ford v. TurnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.