Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Ridley
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 22, 1993No. 92-SP-379PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellant, Chauncey Bennett, appeals from the summary denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that he was entitled to a proper hearing and decision regarding the revocation of his parole by the District of Columbia Board of Parole. He maintains that the Parole Board violated his due process rights as well as his rights under the Board’s statute and regulations. Specifically, he contends that he was wrongly accused of parole violations, his parole detainer was not timely executed, and he was denied a preliminary interview as well as a timely parole…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wilson v. Office of the Chairperson, District of Columbia Board of ParoleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Abdullah v. RoachDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- McRae v. HymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hall v. HendersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Perkins v. HendersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.