Legal Opinion

Stephen Fischer v. Richard Debrincat and Jason Debrincat

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 15, 2015No. 4D14-1855PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the litigation privilege bars a claim for malicious prosecution. In appellant’s malicious prosecution action below, the trial court granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment and later entered final judgment against appellant. We reverse and hold that the litigation privilege cannot be applied to bar the filing of a claim for malicious prosecution where the elements of that tort are satisfied.

Appellees commenced a civil lawsuit against various defendants and later added appellant as a party defendant. In the underlying proceeding, appellees…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. MancusiSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. Levin, Middlebrooks v. US Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1994
  4. Puryear v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. Fridovich v. FridovichSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richard Debrincat v. Stephen FischerSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  2. AGM Investors, LLC v. Business Law Group, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Theresa Rivernider v. Steven H. Meyer and Stephen H. Meyer, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. American Federated Title Corp. v. GrossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. Bradley J. Edwards v. Jeffrey Epstein and Scott RothsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API