Richard Debrincat v. Stephen Fischer
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtPolston, J.
The Fourth District Court of Appeal in Fischer v. Debrincat, 169 So.3d 1204 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), held that the litigation privilege did not bar the filing of a malicious prosecution claim that was based upon the act of adding a party defendant to a civil suit. We have jurisdiction because the Fourth District also certified conflict with the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So.3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). See Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the following reasons, we approve the Fourth District’s decision in Fischer and disapprove the Thud Dis trict’s decision…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. MancusiSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Levin, Middlebrooks v. US Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Tatum Bros. Real Estate & Investment Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- ECHEVARRIA, McCALLA, RAYMER v. ColeSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Wright v. YurkoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada v. Imperial Premium Finance, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- AGM Investors, LLC v. Business Law Group, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Ermini v. ScottDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- Pace v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Two Islands Development Corp. v. ClarkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.