Legal Opinion

Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 21, 1982No. 21071PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Justice.

This is an appeal of the trial court’s judgment requiring payment pursuant to an escrow provision in a written workers’ compensation compromise settlement agreement. Enforcement of the agreement turns on the meaning of the provision “surgery to the back.” Commercial Union Insurance Company presents four arguments as to why the trial court erred in not permitting extrinsic evidence in as to the meaning of “surgery to the back.” We hold that the evidence was properly excluded and accordingly, affirm.

On April 17, 1976, Martinez received an injury to his back while working for his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Sun Oil Co. v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. National Bankers Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Okon v. MBank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  2. Robinson v. Surety Insurance Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Albert Lee Giddens v. Jarrett Huffman, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  4. Okon v. MBank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API