Legal Opinion

Seidenberg v. Summit Bank

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 28, 2002PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

791 A.2d 1068 (2002)

348 N.J. Super. 243

Richard SEIDENBERG and Eric Raymond, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

SUMMIT BANK, Corporate Dynamics and Philadelphia Benefits Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 15, 2001.

Decided February 28, 2002.

Steven E. Angstreich, Philadelphia, PA, argued the cause for appellants (Levy, Angstreich, Finney, Baldante, Rubenstein & Coren, attorneys; Mr. Angstreich, on the brief).

John J. Murphy, III, argued the cause for respondents (Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, attorneys, Cherry Hill; Mr. Murphy and Stephen…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Kham & Nate's Shoes No. 2, Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. First Bank of WhitingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. Dan Beraha, M.D. v. Baxter Health Care CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. John Doe v. Princeton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  2. Huertas v. Galaxy Asset ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. New Jersey Citizen Action v. Schering-Plough Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  4. Jurista v. Amerinox Processing, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
  5. Mylan Inc. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API