Legal Opinion
Dorsa v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 20, 1937No. Civ. 10410PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
From a judgment declaring void Ordinance 102 of the County of Santa Clara and enjoining the defendants from enforcing the same, the latter have appealed and have brought up the judgment roll. The plaintiffs are the owners of and are conducting retail meat markets in the agricultural areas of the county of Santa Clara. Said markets are located in unincorporated territory. On the 25th day of February, 1935, the Board of Supervisors of Santa Clara County adopted ordinance 102. It is as follows:
“An ordinance regulating the hours of business when and the place where, uncured and uncooked meats are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dominion Hotel, Inc. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Ex parte JentzschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ganley v. ClaeysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Skaggs v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- In Re LowenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Justesen's Food Stores, Inc. v. City of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Lynch Meats of Oakland, Inc. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Lynch Meats of Oakland, Inc. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961