Legal Opinion

Skaggs v. City of Oakland

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1936No. S. F. 15437PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, J.

The sole question here involved is that of the validity of section 5-13.024 of an ordinance enacted by the Oakland City Council relating to regulation of the bakery business (Ordinance 463 C. M. S., adding sections 5-13.021, 5-13.022, 5-13.023 and 5-13.024 to the Oakland Municipal Code, adopted December 18, 1934), which section reads as follows: “Sec. 5-13.024, hours and times of delivery of bakery goods. It shall be unlawful for any person to deliver within the City of Oakland any bakery goods on the following holidays: Sunday, New Year’s Day, Washington’s Birthday, Memorial Day, Fourth of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dominion Hotel, Inc. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Ganley v. ClaeysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In Re LowenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. In Re GatsiosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. West Coast Theatres, Inc. v. City of PomonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Perrine v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. McKay Jewelers, Inc. v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Justesen's Food Stores, Inc. v. City of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. People v. AmdurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API