Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Enid Medical Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 14, 2016No. 110,665PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.
1 1 In a medical malpractice action we are asked to review orders excluding testimony from plaintiffs' two expert witnesses and a summary judgment granted to defendants based upon the excluded testimony. We conclude the testimony should not have been excluded. We reverse the orders of the District Court exeluding the testimony and granting summary judgment, and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion.
12 Mrs. Nelson went to the Emergency Department of St. Mary's Regional Medical Center seeking medical assistance at 7:20 pm. on the evening of July 21, 2006,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- MCINTOSH v. WATKINSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- BOYLE v. ASAP ENERGY, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- I. T. K. v. MOUNDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.