Legal Opinion
Howard Shlay v. James Montgomery, Harold Washington & City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 30, 1986No. 85-2943PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Howard Shlay appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees James Montgomery, Harold Washington and the City of Chicago (collectively the “defendants”). Shlay brought this action alleging that his termination as an assistant corporation counsel for Chicago (1) deprived him of his property interest in continued employment without due process, (2) deprived him of his liberty interest in his professional reputation without due process, (3) violated his right to equal protection and due process since…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Nancy Wolf v. City of Fitchburg and G. Jean SeilingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Heller Financial, Inc. v. Midwhey Powder Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Charles Reardon and Gregory Heinzel v. Gary Wroan, Ralph Ebert and Steve PloenseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- James Phelan v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- John J. Whetstine v. The Gates Rubber Company and Squibb-Taylor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.