Legal Opinion

James Phelan v. City of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 21, 2003No. 02-3862PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff James Phelan brought suit after being dismissed from his position of “ward superintendent” by the City of Chicago. Phelan claimed that the City 1) violated the Due Process Clause, 2) breached the Family and Medical Leave Act, and 3) violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The district court granted the City’s motion to dismiss Phelan’s first two causes of action and disposed of the third on summary judgment. Phelan appeals. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Phelan was employed in two separate positions by the City of Chicago. In 1992 he was hired by the City as a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Nagle v. Village of Calumet ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Palka v. SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Robert Formella v. Megan J. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Tanya Cooper-Schut v. Visteon Automotive SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Doris M. Ineichen v. AmeritechCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API