Legal Opinion
The Haagen-Dazs Company, Inc. Pillsbury Company v. Double Rainbow Gourmet Ice Creams, Inc. Two Count Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 5, 1990No. 88-15495PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Per curiam
Double Rainbow Gourmet Ice Creams, Inc. and Two Count Company, Inc., (“Double Rainbow”) appeal the district court’s order awarding The Haagen-Dazs Company, Inc. and Pillsbury Company (“Haagen-Dazs”), as the prevailing parties, $27,-740.70 in copying costs pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 54(d). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
We review the district court’s award of costs for an abuse of discretion. See Alflex Corp. v. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., 914 F.2d 175, 176 (9th Cir.1990) (per curiam).
In Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc., the Supreme Court held that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State of Illinois v. Sangamo Construction Co. And J. L. Simmons Company, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Alflex Corporation v. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. GoldwynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by34 opinions
- Disc Golf Association, Inc. v. Champion Discs, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Smith v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Andrea Resnick v. Netflix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In Re Ricoh Co., Ltd. Patent LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Sea Coast Foods, Inc. v. Lu-Mar Lobster & Shrimp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.