Legal Opinion
Smith v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 26, 1993No. Nos. 91-16758, 91-16876, 91-16877, 92-15815, 92-16901 and 92-16957PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed November 26, 1998, and published at 10 F.3d 1448 (9th Cir.1993), is amended as follows:
With this amendment, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petitions for rehearing filed by Hughes Aircraft Company, Insurance Company of North America, and Smith & Companies.
The petitions for rehearing are DENIED.
AMENDED OPINION
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
In 1985, approximately 2,400 residents of the City of Tucson (“the Valenzuela claims”) sued Hughes Aircraft Company (“Hughes”) for injuries arising out of contamination of their drinking water due to Hughes’ practice of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- American Motorists Insurance v. ARTRA Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Christel Gisela Sopcak, Milan Sopcak, Sara June Sopcak, Libuse Mlcoch, Jaraslav Lutz Maryska v. Northern Mountain Helicopter ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Flanders Electric Motor Service, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Transamerica Insurance Company v. Duro Bag Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Buell Industries, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.