Legal Opinion
Alflex Corporation v. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1990No. 89-56008PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Per curiam
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of respondent Underwriters Laboratories (UL) in a suit brought by appellant Alflex Corporation (Alflex). We affirmed the summary judgment in an unpublished disposition.
In this appeal, Alflex challenges the district court’s award of costs to UL for the expenses UL incurred in obtaining a copy of the transcript of each deposition taken by Alflex and in hiring private process servers to serve deposition subpoenas. Alflex contends that these items are not properly taxable as costs in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford Fitting Co.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Marrian Kolesar and Andrew Kolesar, Her HusbandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- James T. Crues v. Kfc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Sk Hand Tool Corporation and Corcoran Partners, Ltd. v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Henry Hudson v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Cheryle A. Collins and Heywood Fuller T. v. Kay GormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. W&O, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Association of Flight Attendants, Afl-Cio v. Horizon Air Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Gaddis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- In Re Media Vision Technology Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.