Legal Opinion

Cold Metal Process Co. v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 15, 1939No. 6701, 6702PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit judge.

In the court below the Cold Metal Process Company, assignee of Abram F. Steckel, brought suit against Carnegie-Illinois Steel Company and the United States Steel Corporation, charging, inter alia, infringement of Patent No. 1,779,195, hereafter styled ’195, for “method and apparatus for rolling thin sheet like material.” As stated therein, “This application is a division of my application Serial No. 648,-761, filed June 30, 1923.” It is here noted that said Serial No. 648,761 resulted in the grant of Patent No. 1,744,016, hereafter referred to as ’016. On final…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Skelly Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  5. Cold Metal Process Co. v. UNITED STATES ENG. & FOUNDRY CO.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mueller Brass Co. v. Reading Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  3. United States v. Cold Metal Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  4. Himes v. ChadwickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  5. Cold Metal Process Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API