Legal Opinion

Scace v. Wayne County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1904No. 13,455PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to tbe district court for Wayne county: John F. Boyd, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Letton, C.

The plaintiff in error, Stephen B. Scace, is the owner of 313 acres of land adjoining the city of Wayne, part of the same lying in section 16 and part of it in section 17. A road was established by the county commissioners of Wayne county on the section line between sections 16 and 17 across his land. The entire tract was fenced in one body and was used by the plaintiff to furnish pasturage for hire to the inhabitants of the adjoining city of Wayne for their horses and cattle. The tract was irregular in shape. The proposed road entirely cut off and separated one 80 acre tract from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Omaha v. KramerNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. O'NeillNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. McGavock v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Gottschalk v. C., B. & Q. R. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska Railway Co. v. HazelsNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wiles v. Department of Public WorksNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Scott's Bluff County v. Tri-State Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Beste v. Cedar CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  4. McGinley v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Newton Rule v. Sioux CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API