Legal Opinion
Dalow Industries, Inc. v. Jordache Enterprises Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 30, 1985No. 83 Civ. 3780 (WK)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
Defendant Jordache moves to dismiss the second amended complaint on the ground, among others, that plaintiff is precluded from asserting its claims by a previous arbitration proceeding. 1 For reasons which follow, we grant the motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Dalow, a manufacturer of jewelry, has filed three complaints in this action stemming from disputes between it and Jordache under a license agreement. After it filed its first amended complaint, Jordache moved to compel arbitration based upon provisions contained in the agree ment. We granted the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Expert Electric, Inc. v. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- American Renaissance Lines, Inc. v. Saxis Steamship Co., and Multifacs International Traders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Amalia Herbira Zoriano Sanchez, Etc. v. Caribbean Carriers LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cullen v. Paine Webber Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Pennsylvania Engineering Corp. v. Islip Resource Recovery AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Burmah Oil Tankers, Ltd. v. Trisun Tankers, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Hopkinton Drug, Inc. v. CaremarkPCS, L.L.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Vans Inc. v. Rosendahl (In Re Rosendahl)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.