Legal Opinion
State v. Azure
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 25, 2001No. C1-00-61PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
Appellant Joseph Allen Azure brings a direct appeal from his September 21, 1999 conviction for first-degree murder. The only issue on appeal is whether the judge who presided over appellant’s trial should have removed himself pursuant to appellant’s oral pretrial request. Appellant argues that Minn.Stat. § 542.16 (1998), not Minn. R.Crim. P. 26.03, subd. 13(4), governs the removal of judges and that his motion to remove was properly made under the statute. We hold that Rule 26.03, subd. 13(4) sets forth the applicable removal procedure and that appellant did not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Wiedemann v. WiedemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. HeaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Hooper v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Azure v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State of Minnesota v. Alton Dominique FinchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.