Montgomery v. Sayre
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This cause was originally decided by the court in Department, and a rehearing having been granted, it is now before the court in Bank.
It was an action on a promissory note executed by defendant’s testator to the plaintiff. It was given to secure the payment of the note of the Pioneer Gold Mining Company to the plaintiff for one hundred and ten thousand dollars. This last note was indorsed by William S. Chapman. It was further secured by a mortgage on the Pioneer mine, executed by said company.
The above facts appear, and are not disputed. It further appears that there was a prior mortgage…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boston Tunnel Co. v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Hine v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
3Cited by11 opinions
- Southern Pacific Land Co. v. DickersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Murray v. HauserMontana Supreme Court · 1898
- Montgomery v. SayreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Beaulieu Vineyard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Leadbetter v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.