Legal Opinion

In Re Harshey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 2001No. 49S00-9904-DI-261PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

While prosecuting a lawsuit on behalf of a client, lawyer Frank B. Harshey intentionally caused the acceptance of a settlement offer that his client had earlier instructed him to reject. Because of this violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law, we find today that Harshey, the respondent in this attorney disciplinary matter, should be publicly reprimanded.

This case formally began on April 23, 1999, when the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action against the respondent, charging him with violation of two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of CawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Matter of DrozdaIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Matter of DarlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Matter of MullinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re BenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re HarsheyIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API