Matter of Darling
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission has charged that the respondent, Douglas F. Darling, violated the Professional Rules of Conduct for Attorneys at Law by forging the signatures of notaries public on several documents which he later filed in court. The Commission and the respondent have tendered for this Court’s approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline in resolution of this case. Our disciplinary jurisdiction is conferred by the respondent’s admission to this state’s bar on December 13, 1994.
Under Count I of the…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of ConwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Matter of RaglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of GrotrianIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
4Cited by20 opinions
- In Re ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re LitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Matter of GoldingIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- In Matter of PantzerIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.