Legal Opinion

In Re Bender

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1998No. 65S00-9603-DI-249PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The respondent in this attorney disciplinary action has been charged with failing to obtain the consent of a client before initiating a lawsuit on the client’s behalf and thereafter engaging in an impermissible conflict of interest in relation to his representation of that client. Pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11(c), the Disciplinary Commission and the respondent have agreed that certain violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law occurred and that a public reprimand is an appropriate sanction for that misconduct. The…

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re HarsheyIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re HarsheyIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API