Legal Opinion

Crandall v. Master-Eagle Photoengraving Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

This is a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to a stockholders’ agreement in a closed corporation in which the corporation is a party whereby it is provided that 11 Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or concerning or relating to this Agreement or its interpretation, breach, cancellation, performance or non-performance, will be settled and determined by arbitration ’ ’. There is also contained therein an agreement by the corporation to employ the stockholders as managers of the corporation with fixed compensations and “ such additional equal compensation * * * as may be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. In re the Arbitration between LandersmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. In re the Arbitration between Ades & HalpertNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Siegel v. RibakNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Dubin v. MuchnickNew York Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API