Legal Opinion

Segall v. Garlichs

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTTO', J.- —

-The plaintiff ¡sued defendant under a petition in two counts, the first for false imprisonment, the second for malicious prosecution. Issues were raised by the pleadings, and there was. a trial before a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s, evidence the defendant presented to the court the following instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence:

‘'The court instructs the jury that under the pleadings and plaintiff’s evidence your verdict should be for the defendant. ’ ’

The record entries and bill of exceptions filed by the defendant recite the offering of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bussiere's Admisnistrator v. SaymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. Chouteau v. RowseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Millar v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. McClure v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. Lewis v. Center Creek Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pence v. Kansas City Laundry Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Fenton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. McIlvain v. KavorinosSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Kimberling v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. Porter v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API