Legal Opinion

Porter v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 3, 1930PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrank, J.

Action by plaintiff, William S. Porter, against respondent railroad, T. A. Briscoe and J. P. Murphy to recover damage for personal injuries. The verdict of the jury was in favor of defendants Briscoe and Murphy, and against defendant railroad in the sum of $10,000. In due time defendant railroad filed two motions, one for a new trial, the other in arrest of judgment. The trial court by order entered of record sustained both motions. Plaintiff appealed from the order and judgment of the court sustaining defendant’s motion for new trial.

After the appeal was granted, plaintiff, William S.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Manthey v. Kellerman Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  2. Snoddy v. County of PettisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Stid v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Stoner v. RoyarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  5. Segall v. GarlichsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Willis v. WillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Sakowski v. BairdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Gosnell v. GosnellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Hoehn v. HamptonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API