Legal Opinion

In Re the Revocation of License to Practice Dentistry of Flynn

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1958No. 34338PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*591Finley, J.

Dr. Harry V. Flynn, a licensed dentist, practicing in the state of Washington, is charged in the instant case with unprofessional conduct. He was given a statutory administrative hearing (RCW 43.24.110), at which he was represented by counsel. The administrative hearing board found that Dr. Flynn was guilty of three counts of unprofessional conduct. Based upon this, the director of licenses of the state of Washington issued an order revoking Dr. Flynn’s license to practice dentistry. Dr. Flynn appealed to-'the superior court, which heard the cause upon the record made before the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Household Finance Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Patton v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. In Re HarmonWashington Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Heinmiller v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Heinmiller v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Standow v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Bach v. Florida State Bd. of DentistryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API