Legal Opinion

Hein v. Huber

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

In disposing of motions made after verdict the trial court said:

“If this court was sitting as a jury and to decide the facts in this case, I do not believe I would have decided this case as the jury decided it. However, that is not a test of the efficacy of the verdict as returned by a jury. This verdict is not against physical facts or any undisputed situation and is not against all the reasonable inferences that can be drawn from disputed situations.”

After a careful examination of the record, we concur in the opinion expressed by the trial court. The evidence as disclosed by the numerous…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. RiessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Mader v. BoehmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Terrien v. RoenitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Reardon v. TerrienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thorp v. LandsawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Commerce Insurance v. Badger Paint & Hardware Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Freuen v. BrennerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State Ex Rel. Shaffer v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Wallin v. SutherlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API