Legal Opinion
Hein v. Huber
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
In disposing of motions made after verdict the trial court said:
“If this court was sitting as a jury and to decide the facts in this case, I do not believe I would have decided this case as the jury decided it. However, that is not a test of the efficacy of the verdict as returned by a jury. This verdict is not against physical facts or any undisputed situation and is not against all the reasonable inferences that can be drawn from disputed situations.”
After a careful examination of the record, we concur in the opinion expressed by the trial court. The evidence as disclosed by the numerous…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schmidt v. RiessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Mader v. BoehmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Terrien v. RoenitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Reardon v. TerrienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thorp v. LandsawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Commerce Insurance v. Badger Paint & Hardware Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Freuen v. BrennerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Shaffer v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Wallin v. SutherlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.