Legal Opinion

Freuen v. Brenner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1962PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The first question is whether there is any credible evidence to sustain the verdict that H. A. Freuen was causally negligent. If there is, the verdict should not be disturbed. Freuen testified that he had been driving behind the Oldsmobile and the Plymouth at a speed of approximately 50 to 55 m.p.h. some 200 feet behind the Plymouth. About the distance of two blocks south of the intersection, the Ellis Oldsmobile gave a signal for a right turn and the line of cars started to slow down. As Freuen reached a point about 200 feet from the intersection traveling 35 m.p.h., Brenner, like a blur,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Unruh v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Kincannon v. National Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Feldstein v. HarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Neider v. SpoehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Spleas v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Pucci v. RauschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. August Schmidt Co. v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Gleason v. GillihanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API