Terrien v. Roenitz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The errors claimed by appellants are (1) that the findings of the jury relating to the negligence of Mrs. Roenitz and of the deceased should have been changed upon their motion and the complaint dismissed; and that if the complaint should not have been dismissed, a new trial should have been granted because the findings of the jury are inconsistent; and that (2) the damages for pecuniary loss are excessive as reduced by the court and should have been further reduced or a new trial granted.(1) The answers of the jury to the questions relating to negligence of Mrs. Roenitz are clearly supported…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Pagel v. HolewinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Hein v. HuberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Reardon v. TerrienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Schneider v. NeumanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957