Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kerans v. Porter Paint Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1991No. 90-1036Published

1DissentHolmes, J.

I am in sympathy with the majority in its attempt to benefit individuals who have been victimized by some form of sex-based harassment; however, I cannot join the majority in its creation of a new tort against an employer which has no foundation in common law.

As a threshold to this discussion, I should point out that the majority has failed to define what conduct constitutes a cause of action for “sexual harassment.” Thus, I am unable to discern what elements constitute a cause of action for this new tort.4

*497I

Common-Law Remedies

The majority states that “there is no legitimate policy reason for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Darla G. Hall, Patty J. Baxter and Jeannette Ticknor v. Gus Construction Co., Inc. And John MundorfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  3. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Iris McKinney v. Honorable Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  5. Helmick v. Cincinnati Word Processing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API