Kerans v. Porter Paint Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentHolmes, J.
I am in sympathy with the majority in its attempt to benefit individuals who have been victimized by some form of sex-based harassment; however, I cannot join the majority in its creation of a new tort against an employer which has no foundation in common law.
As a threshold to this discussion, I should point out that the majority has failed to define what conduct constitutes a cause of action for “sexual harassment.” Thus, I am unable to discern what elements constitute a cause of action for this new tort.4
*497I
Common-Law Remedies
The majority states that “there is no legitimate policy reason for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Darla G. Hall, Patty J. Baxter and Jeannette Ticknor v. Gus Construction Co., Inc. And John MundorfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Iris McKinney v. Honorable Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Helmick v. Cincinnati Word Processing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.