Sheldone v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CAIAZZA, United States Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons stated below, the Defendant Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission’s (“the Commission’s” or “the Defendant’s”) motion for a protective order (Doc. 23, hereinafter cited as “Def.’s Mot.”) will be granted as consistent with this Order.
BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
The Plaintiffs, members of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 30 (“Local 30”) who are employed by the Commission (hereinafter “the Plaintiffs”), filed this lawsuit on October 7, 1999 alleging that the Defendant violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Jacqueline Pearson, Individually and as Parent & Natural Guardian of Lindsay Pearson v. Bruce Miller Luzerne County Children & Youth Services, Inc. Luzerne County Children & Youth Services, Inc., Defendant/third-Party v. Kidspeace National Centers for Kids in Crisis, Inc., Third Party Luzerne County Children & Youth Services, Inc. Kidspeace National Centers for Kids in Crisis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Folb v. Motion Picture Industry Pension & Health PlansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Teligent, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Team Design v. GottliebCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hibbing Taconite Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Sampson v. School District of LancasterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.