Legal Opinion

Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Cambell

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 10, 1920PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Suit to quiet and determine the title to real estate, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Hartford County, Máltbie, Jupon demurrer to the answer and cross-complaint of the defendant Cambell; the court sustained the demurrer, found the issues for the plaintiff, and adjudged that the plaintiff and the defendant John Cope, as tenants in common, had an absolute title in fee simple to the land, and from this judgment the defendant Cambell appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The complaint is brought under General Statutes, § 5113, to determine defendant Cam-bell’s adverse claim to number 117 Market Street, Hartford, which it alleges is owned in common by-plaintiff and defendant Cope, and to quiet and settle the title to the same.

Cambell’s claim is alleged to have arisen under a written agreement of sale by which, fairly' construed, the plaintiff and Cope agree to sell to the defendant Cambell these premises for $10,000, payable, $100 upon execution of agreement, and the balance, $3,900 in cash, the assumption of a first mortgage of $3,000 and a second mortgage to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loud v. Pomona Land & Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Foote v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  3. Pacific Timber Co. v. Iowa Windmill & Pump Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Loewenberg v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Texas Co. v. Crown Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  4. Kunian v. Development Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Levine v. ReynoldsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API