Legal Opinion

Neal v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 11, 1964No. 37244PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for aggravated assault upon a child; the punishment, one hundred eighty days in jail.

The purported statement of facts found in the record contains the testimony of one witness, called by the state, but the agreement of counsel reflects that it does not include all the testimony adduced at the trial.

In the absence of a complete statement of facts containing all the evidence adduced upon the trial, we cannot pass upon appellant’s complaint to the court’s charge. Bailey v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 448, 342 S.W.2d 338; Booker v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R, 667, 352…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Booker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Priego v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1983
  2. Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Priego v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API