Bailey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McDonald, judge.
The appellant was indicted for assault with intent to murder with malice aforethought, but the jury found her guilty of aggravated assault and assessed her punishment at sixteen months in jail.
It appears from the agreement of the attorneys for both the state and the appellant and from the certificate of the court reporter, containing no certificate of approval by the trial judge, that the statement of facts is only a partial statement of the facts and that it does not contain all the evidence adduced at the trial.
Hence, the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be appraised.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Mitcham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
3Cited by2 opinions
- Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Booker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961