Mays v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Commissioner.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for murder. Punishment was assessed by the jury at ten years. .
*847Appellant’s sole contention is that the court erred in failing to charge the jury on the law of murder without malice.
The record reflects that appellant timely presented her written objection to the court’s charge complaining of the court’s failure to instruct the jury on the law of murder without malice.
The State points to the fact that there is not a complete transcription of the court reporter’s notes and that only the testimony of appellant is in the record before…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barrientez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Lucky v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Sellars v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Emanus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Medlock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.