Legal Opinion
State v. Burnett
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 17, 2001No. 2000-0266PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 419.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BURNETT, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Burnett,
2001-Ohio-1581.] Constitutional law—Municipal corporations—Cincinnati ordinance establishes drug-exclusion zones within city—Chapter 755 of the Cincinnati Municipal Code is an unconstitutional violation of the right to travel as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and a violation of Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution—Supreme Court of Ohio not bound by rulings on federal statutory or…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gordon Schuster v. Prestige Senior Management LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- In re Application for Correction of Birth Record of AdelaideOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- Dewine v. State Farm Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- In re Application for Correction of Birth Record of AdelaideOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. DunlapOhio Supreme Court · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.