Legal Opinion

Mercola v. Chester

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1950No. Civ. 17349PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Action for partition of a 99-year leasehold interest in real property, together with a building thereon, the lease having been made in favor of plaintiff Thomas D. Mercóla for the benefit of himself, plaintiff Archie A. Mercóla, and defendant Frank B. Chester. The-Mercólas subsequently-assigned one half of their interest to plaintiff Joseph V. Quinn. An interlocutory judgment of partition was entered in which it was decreed that (1) the parties to the action * are the owners of an undivided interest in lessee’s interest as follows: Plaintiffs Thomas D. Mercola and Archie A. Mercóla 12% per…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. EvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Ventre v. TiscorniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Wallace v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Donlon v. DonlonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Colmet-Daage v. Cremoux CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. DeMartini v. DeMartini CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API