Mercola v. Chester
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
Action for partition of a 99-year leasehold interest in real property, together with a building thereon, the lease having been made in favor of plaintiff Thomas D. Mercóla for the benefit of himself, plaintiff Archie A. Mercóla, and defendant Frank B. Chester. The-Mercólas subsequently-assigned one half of their interest to plaintiff Joseph V. Quinn. An interlocutory judgment of partition was entered in which it was decreed that (1) the parties to the action * are the owners of an undivided interest in lessee’s interest as follows: Plaintiffs Thomas D. Mercola and Archie A. Mercóla 12% per…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Higgins v. EvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Ventre v. TiscorniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Wallace v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Donlon v. DonlonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Colmet-Daage v. Cremoux CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
- DeMartini v. DeMartini CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.