Legal Opinion

Cihacek v. National Labor Relations Board

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided February 14, 1979No. Civ. 79-0-17PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DENNEY, District Judge.

On December 29, 1975, the National Labor Relations Board [the Board] conducted an election among the employees of the Pacesetter Corporation [Pacesetter] for the purpose of choosing a bargaining representative. A majority of the employees selected an association known as the Better Relations Committee [BRC], which was entrusted with the duty of representing the plaintiff and his co-workers. The BRC negotiated a collective bargaining agreement with Pacesetter after the 1975 election. This agreement expired on February 1, 1979.

On November 21, 1978, the United…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Boire v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional De Marineros De HondurasSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Physicians National House Staff Association v. John H. FanningCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. Hartz Mountain Corporation v. Donald L. Dotson, Chairman, National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Physicians National House Staff Association v. John H. FanningCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API