Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided February 2, 1994No. 10-93-140-CRPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

A jury found Edward Harold Bell guilty of murder and assessed punishment at seventy years confinement. Bell contends in three points that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the verdict, that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, and that the court erred by failing to instruct the jury on voluntary conduct. We affirm.

On the afternoon of August 28,1978, Dorothy Lang was looking out her kitchen window and saw Edward Bell park his truck across the street from her house. When he stepped out of the truck, she saw that he was wearing only a red…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Losada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Ex Parte MenchacaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Kincaid v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  2. McClenton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  3. Blondett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  4. Szmalec v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  5. Rios v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API