Rios v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELIPE REYNA, Justice.
Raul Rios appeals his conviction for aggravated kidnapping, challenging: (1) the admission of a prior conviction (two points); (2) the admission of letters from the victim; and (3) the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence (two points). We affirm.
LEGAL AND FACTUAL SUFFICIENCY
We begin with Rios’s fourth and fifth points in which he contends that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to sustain his aggravated kidnapping conviction.
Applicable Law
Under legal sufficiency review, we determine whether, after viewing all the evidence in the light most…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Santellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- David Shane West v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- Fisk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Derrick Jamal McKenzie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021
- James Leonard Tansimore v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2026
- Nico Allen-Antonio Cogdill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.