Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Menchaca

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 12, 1993No. 71567PublishedCited by 184 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAIRD, Judge.

This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 11.07, § 2. Applicant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance and sentenced to seventy-three years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Menchaca v. State, No. 03-90-0028-CR (Tex.App. — Austin, delivered February 13, 1991, pet. ref’d). Ap plicant contends he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial. 1

Applicant was tried for delivery of 0.13 grains of methamphetamine. During cross-examination, the State elicited testimony from…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Bridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by184 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Robertson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Wolfe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Yazdchi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  5. Kemp v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995

179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API