Ex Parte Menchaca
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAIRD, Judge.
This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 11.07, § 2. Applicant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance and sentenced to seventy-three years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Menchaca v. State, No. 03-90-0028-CR (Tex.App. — Austin, delivered February 13, 1991, pet. ref’d). Ap plicant contends he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial. 1
Applicant was tried for delivery of 0.13 grains of methamphetamine. During cross-examination, the State elicited testimony from…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Bridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Robertson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Wolfe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Yazdchi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Kemp v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.