Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Grosso

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge.

Joseph Grosso was tried non-jury, upon stipulated facts, and was found guilty of pos*793session of a small amount of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia. He was sentenced for the drug paraphernalia charge to serve a one (1) year period of probation, to perform forty (40) hours of community service and to pay a fine of three hundred ($800.00) dollars.1 On direct appeal from the judgment of sentence, Grosso asserts that, absent reasonable suspicion that he was presently involved in criminal activity, it was improper for police to seek his consent for a search of his vehicle…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PlessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. FrancisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Com. v. Henderson, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Lamb, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. Hart, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API