Commonwealth v. Hart

DANTOS, J,

— Defendant, Clarence Hart, has filed an appeal from this court’s order of July 29, 2010, which denied the defendant’s post sentence motions. Accordingly, we are issuing this opinion pursuant to the provisions of Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 1925.

*391The relevant facts are as follows: Defendant, Clarence Henry Hart, after a jury trial, was found guilty of the charges of robbery1, burglary,2 theft by unlawful taking3, simple assault4, criminal conspiracy to commit robbery5 and criminal conspiracy to commit burglary.6 Thereafter, on July 6, 2010, this court sentenced the…