Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Harris v. Sunset Car Wash, LLC

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 2012No. B233915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRIEGLER, J.

Labor Code section 20501 et seq. established a regulatory scheme for carwash operators, motivated by a legislative concern that car-wash employees were not being paid in accordance with law. One component of the statutory scheme—section 2066—imposes liability upon a “successor” to a carwash employer for unpaid wages and penalties owed by a predecessor employer in four circumstances, including where the successor uses the same facilities to perform substantially the same services as the predecessor. We hold that the four circumstances of liability set forth in section 2066…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Green v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kasler v. LockyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Olson v. Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Britton v. GirardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Britton v. GirardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API