Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided May 9, 1929No. Docket Nos. 23159, 40707, 40708Published

Held, petitioner, D. F. Strickland, was an employee of a political subdivision of the State of Texas and that his compensation is exempt from tax.

1Opinion of the Court

D. F. STRICKLAND AND OLIVE STRICKLAND, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Strickland v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 23159, 40707, 40708.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

16 B.T.A. 419; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2583;

May 9, 1929, Promulgated

Held, petitioner, D. F. Strickland, was an employee of a political subdivision of the State of Texas and that his compensation is exempt from tax.

Camden R. McAtee, Esq., for the petitioners.

E. W. Shinn, Esq., and E. M. Niess, Esq., for the respondent.

TRAMMELL

These proceedings, which were consolidated are for the redetermination of deficiencies in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. United States v. GermaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Hall v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. United States v. MauriceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1823

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API