Legal Opinion

United States v. Pedro Vizcarra-Angulo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1990No. 89-50397PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

Pedro Vizcarra-Angulo appeals his forty-month sentence for conspiracy to possess heroin with intent to distribute. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

On April 24, 1989, Vizcarra-Angulo pled guilty to one count of violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) (1988). In return for his cooperation, the government agreed to recommend a forty-month sentence, which is below the statutory minimum of five years. The presentence report had calculated a sentence of eighty-seven months in custody under the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court accepted the government’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Lucio MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Dana PighettiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Merle Left Hand BullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Claude Herschel WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. Lydia CooperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Paul Frederick LaneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Ira Marvin DickeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Ladonna M. RigginsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Myron KeeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API